(1.) P. K. Jain, J. List has been revised. None appears for opposite party No. 1.
(2.) HEARD Shri S. A. Shah, learned coun sel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.
(3.) LEARNED AGA contends that so far as remand order is concerned it has to be sustained on the ground that while arriving at the finding of possession in favour of present revisionist the City Magistrate was influenced by the evidence which was inad missible.