AWADHESH BAHADUR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) T. P. Garg, J. Heard the learned coun sel for the petitioner/revisionist and the learned A. G. A. for the State. Both have agreed that this revision/petition may be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18-3-1997, passed by respon dent No. 4, rejecting the application of the petitioner for release of the vehicle No. MP-19/7369 on the ground that no charge- sheet has so far been filed and hence he has no jurisdiction to pass any order on the ap plication of the petitioner.

(3.) WITH the aforesaid direction, this revision/petition is disposed of finally.