CHANDA Vs. HAIDERI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 1.

(2.) BY means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner prays for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 27.9.1991 passed by respondent No. 3 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and the order dated 17.6.1986 passed by the Prescribed Authority allowing the release application of the respondent No. 1.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner vehemently urged that the authorities below did not record findings on the relevant question involved in the case, i.e. bona fide and genuine need and comparative hardship. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that the findings on all relevant questions were recorded by the authorities below, which were based on relevant evidence on record and the same cannot be interfered by the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.