RAM BABU KUSHWAHA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. K. Seth, J. The petitioner alleges that part of land belonging to his grand father was acquired for the purpose of establishing a tube-well. According to the Government Order dated 21-12-1981 for grant of employment to the land looser, the petitioner claims appointment on the ground thereof.

(2.) MR. C. B. Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner relies on the decision in the case oinagendra Nath Chan be v. Ex ecutive Engineer Public Tube-well Region Prakhand Faizabad and others, in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 10868 of 1990, disposed of on 8-1-1993, a copy whereof in Annexure-5 to the writ petition and Mohd. Samsad All and others v. State of U. P. and others, 1992 Vol. I UPLBEC 128 and contends that the person similarly situated was directed to be given appoint ment by the said judgment.

(3.) MR. Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner also contends that by reason of the Government order dated 21-12-1981, contained in Annexure-1 to the writ peti tion, three conditions are to be fulfilled for the purpose of attracting the provisions of said Government Order which according to him has been fulfilled in the present case. The said three conditions are that the land has been acquired for which the families have been displaced, that the family should consisted of minimum two members and that if he is eligible for ap pointment in the project in such post, which are outside the purview of the Public Service Commission.