DASHRATH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri S. S. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri D. K. Singh for the private complainant, besides learned A. G. A. for the State.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the revisionists does not press the revision petition against the conviction of the revisionists under Sections 379, 324/34 and 326/34, I.P.C., under which hands the revisionists have been convicted by the trial Magistrate, i.e., the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi in Criminal Case No. 2189 of 1988 and confirmed by the appellate court, i.e., the Vlth Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 1989. Accordingly, the revision petition against conviction of the revisionists is dismissed.

(3.) THE revision petition is accordingly disposed of on the following terms : THE sentences of six months, one year and two years' R.I. under Sections 379, 324/34 and 326/34, I.P.C. respectively of the revisionists are reduced to the period already undergone and they are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) each out of which Rs. 15,000 will be paid to the complainant as compensation for the injuries suffered by him. THE revisionist are directed to surrender in court of the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi within one month from the date of receipt of the record in the lower court.