(1.) -
(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the VII Addl. District Judge, Kanpur, dated 18-6-1987.
(3.) THE Prescribed Authority, after considering the evidence led by the parties, held that the need for the accommodation of respondents no. 1 and 2 are neither bonafide nor genuine and rejected the application for release, vide his order, dated 19th November, 1985 which was challenged by the respondents no. 1 and 2 by filing an appeal before the AddI. District Judge, respondent no. 3, who, on consideration of the evidence on record, held that the need of respondents no. 1 and 2 for the accommodation in dispute, was bonafide and genuine and that greater hardship would be caused to them if the application for release of the accommodation was not allowed and vide his order, dated 18-7-1987, he allowed the appeal ordering the release of the accommodation in dispute to respondents no. 1 and 2 which is subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.