SARNAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 13 -6 -86 passed by Ilnd Munsif Magistrate, Etawah in a case under section 323/324 IPC summoning the applicants under section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code).

(2.) IT appears that the case was proceeding and some statement in Examination in Chief was made by PW 1 Janak Singh who stated that the present applicant were also accused in the said case. An application thereafter was made under section 319 (1) of the Code for summoning the applicants and that application was allowed. Against that order present revision has been filed.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the applicant urged that it appears that cross -examination was not conducted and only statement was recorded in Examination in Chief, hence the same cannot be said to be a complete statement or com - plete evidence and the applicants could not be summoned just on the basis of the statement made in the examination -in -chief. Reliance was placed on Amarjeet Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983 CrLJ NOC 98.