MEGH NATH Vs. ADDL CIVIL JUDGE MAINPURI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that some trees were allegedly planted by the petitioners on the oral permission of respondents 3 and 4. Since respondents 3 and 4 have threatened to cut away the trees, hence the petitioners prayed for a temporary injunction in the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that, in case, the respondents are permitted to cut away the trees and an order of injunction is denied to the petitioners then not only the suit shall become infructuous but the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. Both the courts below have considered the prayer for temporary injunction and rejected the same on merit, hence this writ petition.

(3.) A certified copy of this order shall be issued to the learned counsel for the petitioners on payment of usual charges within a week. Petition dismissed.