OM PRAKASH Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision aginst the judgment of Sessions Judge, Lucknow, who had confirmed the sentence and conviction awarded to the revisionist under Section 392 IPC to undergo three years' R.I. and under Section 25, Arms Act to undergo one month's R. I., the sentences having been made concurrent.

(2.) AT the time when this revision was moved, Hon'ble K. B. Srivastava, J., had issued an enhancement notice rejecting bail to the revisionist. In that view of the matter, the criminal revision coupled with notice of enhancement is being heard today by us.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved, an appeal was taken to the Court of Sessions. The learned Sessions Judge, on an appraisement of evidence, concurred with the findings of the Asstt. Sessions Judge confirmed the sentences and conviction awarded to the revisionist and rejected his appeal.