(1.) THE only ground upon which the opposite party pressed the suit for ejectment of the tenant (applicant) was non-payment of rent in spite of a notice of demand. THE trial court upheld this plea and decreed the suit for ejectment.
(2.) THE tenant has come to this court in revision under S. 25, Small Cause Courts Act.
(3.) THE relevant and material words which require consideration in this case are "the entire amount of rent and damages...... due from him." THE question is: would the entire amount include arrears of rent, the recovery of which has become barred by time?