DHARAMPAL Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Dharam Pal has filed this revision against his conviction and sentence of six months' R.I. Under Sec. 411 IPC.

(2.) For the purpose of this revision the following facts may be taken as finally proved:

(3.) On behalf of the Applicant his learned Counsel Sri P.N. Misra contended that as there was no evidence, direct or circumstantial, to prove that the bullocks were stolen, the Applicant could not be convicted Under Sec. 411 IPC. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that this contention is well -founded.