LAWS(ALL)-1957-9-23

TAHSILDAR SINGH Vs. STATE

Decided On September 11, 1957
TAHSILDAR SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Certain incidents allegedly took place on the 2nd and 3rd September, 1954 at Panderi Khar and Bhua Khar, police circle Sahson in the district of Etawah, in which fire-arms including hand-grenades were used, and in the course of which police informer Karan Singh and constable Dudh Nath Singh were mortally wounded and constables Sri Kishan and Dukhi Rai seriously injured with fire-arras also unlicensed D.B.B.L. .500 bore rifle Ex. I and a large number of cartridges were allegedly recovered at Bhua Khar and Tahsildar Singh arrested. After investigation and commitment proceedings Tahsildar was sent up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge of Etawah, who framed the following eight charges against them:

(2.) Tahsildar Singh has filed Appeal No. 1389 of 1956 against his conviction and sentences, while the State Government have preferred Appeal No. 1918 of 1956 against the order of acquittal in respect of the murder of constable Dudh Nath. We shall deal with both the appeals and the reference under Section 374, Cr. P. C., together. II--BACKGROUND OF CASE AND TOPOGRAPHY.

(3.) The history of Tahsildar's family unfolds a woeful tale of an ordinary village feud leading to banditry and large-scale crime. For a proper understanding of this case a brief account of it is necessary. Khera Rathore in police circle Bah, district Agra, is a small village inhabited mostly by Rajputs of the martial Rathore clan. One of them, Man Singh, figures prominently in this case as the leader of the dangerous gang of dacoits and murderers. Two of his sons are Subedar Singh and the appellant Tahsildar Singh. This family was closely connected with a Brahmin family of the village, one of whose members, Rupa by name, subsequently became an active member of Man Singh's gang. Man Singh had formed a faction of his own in Khera Rathore. The leader of the rival party was one Talfi Ram Brahmin. A clash between the two parties occurred in 1928 in the course of which Talfi Ram's party suffered losses in dead and wounded. Man Singh's party was prosecuted for the crime, and Man Singh and several others were found guilty under Section 302/149 I. P. C. and sentenced to transportation for life. But two of the party Man Singh's eldest son Jaswant Singh and nephew Darshan Singh, absconded and could not be apprehended. A Rathore of the village, Khem Singh by name, who was distantly related to Man Singh, was pressed by the police to disclose the whereabouts of the absconders, and some time in 1937 when he did so an encounter with the police took place in which Jaswant and Darshan were shot dead while Man Singh's brother Nawab Singh and two other relatives were arrested, duly tried and convicted. After serving out his life sentence for the murders of 1928 Man Singh was released in 1939. He immediately started harassing the families of Talfi Ram and Khem Singh, and the relations between the two got so exacerbated that proceedings under Section 107 Cr. P. C. had to be drawn up against them both. Man Singh and his party were bound over, but Khem Singh was discharged. Man Singh's period of security expired at the end of May 1940, whereupon on the night between the 4th and 5th July, 1940, members of his faction launched a murderous attack to Khem Singh's party, killing two of them. Khem Singh lodged the first information report at police station Bah in which among others he named Subedar and Tahsildar as the assailants. These two men immediately made themselves scarce, and proceedings under Sections 87 and 88 Cr. P. C. against them remained fruitless. Several of those named in Khem Singh's report were tried and sentenced by the Sessions Judge of Agra to transportation for life. The High Court dismissed their appeal, and in its judgment expressed disapproval of the lesser sentence for murder passed by the trial court. It is quite possible that it was because of this observation of the High Court that Subedar and Tahsildar resolved not to surrender, and it is a matter of interest that Tahsildar was arrested as late as the 3rd September, 1954 (as we shall presently see) while Subedar was shot dead in 1955 during an encounter with the police.