REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

AIDAL SINGH Appellant

V/S

KARAN SINGH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PASHUPATI BHARATI V. SECRETARY OF STATE [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH KESHAV KHADILKAR V. POONA MUNICIPALITY [REFERRED TO]
P.V.RAO V. KHUSHALDAS S.ADVANI [REFERRED TO]
VENKATANARAYANA V. RAMASWAMY [REFERRED TO]
RASHID AHMED VS. MUNICIPAL BOARD KAIRANA OPPOSITE PARTY; AND UNION OF INDIA AND STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
CHARANJIT LAL CHOWDHARY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. MADAN GOPAL RUNGLA [REFERRED TO]
G VEERAPPA PILLAI PROPRIETOR SATHI VILASBUS SERVICE PORAYAR TANJORE DISTRICT MADRAS VS. RAMAN AND RAMAN LTD [REFERRED TO]
D N BANERJI VS. P R MUKHERJEE [REFERRED TO]
ELECTION COMMISSION INDIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
WARYAM SINGH VS. AMARNATH [REFERRED TO]
T C BASAPPA VS. T NAGAPPA [REFERRED TO]
MOTILAL VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
RAM PRASAD VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
JODHEY VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
BANKEY BEHARI LAL VS. LALA BABU RAJA BABU [REFERRED TO]
HARIPADA DUTTA VS. ANANTA MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
BELAIT SHEIKH VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN BUDGE BUDGE MUNICIPALITY VS. MONGRU MIA [REFERRED TO]
SUKHENDU BIKASH BARUA VS. HARE KRISHNA DE [REFERRED TO]
M RAMAYYA VS. STATE OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
GANGALAKURTHI PATTISAM VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
V TIRUPULISWAMY NAIDU VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
A R SARIN VS. B C PATIL [REFERRED TO]
TUKARAM PIRAJI VS. MOTILAL POONA MILLS LTD [REFERRED TO]
NAKSHED BHAGAT VS. JIREKHAN SAH [REFERRED TO]
HAMID HASAN NOMANI VS. BANWARILAL ROY [REFERRED TO]
RYOTS OF GARABANDHO VS. ZEMINDAR OF PARLAKIMEDI [REFERRED TO]
ANNAMALAI MUDALIAR VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These four appeals are in the nature of test cases fixed before this Full Bench in order to determine the question whether, under the rules of this Court, a special appeal lies to a division Bench from the decision, of a Single Judge on a petition for the issue of a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution. The point was fully argued before us by the learned counsel for the appellants in each of the appeals and we are obliged to Mr. Jagdish Swarup for the assistance which he gave us, as amicus curiae by putting the other side of the case before us.

(2.) The necessary facts relating to all the four appeals are stated in the order of my learned brother, Beg J., and it ig unnecessary for me to repeat them.

(3.) The question raised before us depends upon the interpretation on Rule 5 of Chapter VIII of the rules of the Court. That rule reads as follows:-

Click here to view full judgment.

AIDAL SINGH Vs. KARAN SINGH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address