RAJAN SINGH Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Xt arises in tire following circumstances :

(2.) The petitioners are owners of certain plots of land situate in villages Bi.sokhar and Eegamabad, pcrgana Jalabad, district Mcerut. The Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co, Limited is situated near the petitioner's plots. Under a scheme, which is subsidised by the Government of India, there was a proposal to construct certain buildings for the residence of the labourers employed in the mills and also for other amenities for the staff and workers. The company proposed acquisition of five bighas and odd of land in village Begamabad and a little more than 12 bighas in village Bisokhar. The Government made some inquiries and it appears from paragraph 6 of the counter-affidavit that the company has actually deposited the estimated costs of those constructions with the, Government in compliance with a letter sent by the Land Acquisition Officer to it on the 10th of February, 1955. The Land Acquisition Officer then recommended to the Government that a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act may be issued and a notification was duly published in the gazette dated 12th September, 1955. The notification shows that the land was to be acquired for constructions in connection with the subsidised scheme. There was some mistake in the notification in describing the land to be acquired and the mistake was corrected by subsequent notifications dated 12th October and 24th November, 1955, which were also duly published in the gazette. The petitioners filed objections under Section 5 A of the Land Acquisition Act and the Land Acquisition Officer, after hearing the parties, submitted his report on the 15th of May, 1956, recommending the acquisition of the land. After the receipt of the report, the Government issued a notification under Sections 6 and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act which was published in the U. P gazettes dated 21st June and 29th June, 1956. The present petition was then filed on 22nd August 1956, praying for the quashing of the notification issued under Sections 6 and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act.

(3.) The learned counsel for the petitioners has urged only pne point in support of the petition. His case is that the land in this case is being acquired for a company, namely, the Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Limited and that being the position, the provisions of Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act arc attracted to the case and, as no agreement had yet been entered into between the company and the Government as required by Sections 39 and 41 of the Land Acquisition Act, no notification under Section 6 or 17 of the Act could legally be issued, I think that there is force in this contention. The provisions of Section 39 of the Land Acquisition Act are important and they may be quoted in full. They are-