MOHD. FIROZ Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By means of this writ petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

(2.) The brief facts giving rise to filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioner is a regular stage carriage permit holder for route Muzaffarnagar-Kutehshra via Rohana and allied routes. Before 13.01986, five permit holders were permitted to ply the buses on the route in question and the petitioner was one of them regular stage carriage permit holder but while issuing the order impugned dated 03.01.2017 the permit of the petitioner was not included in the list of the persons authorised to ply the vehicles on above route, thus, the present writ petition.

(3.) For proper adjudication of the controversy involved in the present writ petition, it would be just to reproduce below the relevant provisions of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 -