VIRENDRA PANDEY Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sanjai Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Sanjiv Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents.

(2.) This writ petition under Art. 226 of Constitution of India is directed against judgment and order dated 06.03.2014 passed by State Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") in Claim Petition No. 849 of 2006.

(3.) Petitioner was working in U.P. State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. and was allowed retirement under Voluntary Retirement Scheme vide order dated 01.03.2000. H filed aforesaid Claim Petition seeking following reliefs: ...[VERNACULAR TEXT OMITTED]...