REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAJESH KUMAR Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MUNNA LAL V. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
HARI VISHNU KAMATH VS. AHMAD ISHAQUE [REFERRED TO]
UDIT NARAIN SINGH MALPAHARIA VS. ADDITIONAL MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
GULABCHAND CHHOTALAL PARIKH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SHANTI KUMAR R CANJI VS. HOME INSURANCE CO OF NEW YORK [REFERRED TO]
BABUBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL VS. NANDLAL KHODTDAS BAROT [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATE OF PUNJAB VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PRABODH VERMA DAL CHAND VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SARGUJA TRANSPORT SERVICE VS. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL M P GWALIOR [REFERRED TO]
INDU SHEKHAR SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
ANAND SHARADCHANDRA OKA VS. UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI [REFERRED TO]
TRIDIP KUMAR DINGAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION UTTARANCHAL VS. MAMTA BISHT [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY KUMAR KAUL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
AMIN KHAN VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
Dharam Raj VS. State of U. P. and others [REFERRED TO]
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. VS. RADHEY SHYAM PANDEY AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
MADAN MOHAN SHARMA VS. S.D.M. JASRANA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
POONAM VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri Balram Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Daya Shankar Tewari, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 4, Shri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 5 and perused the record.

(2.) By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.04.2017 (Annexure No. 1) passed by opposite party No. 2/Commissioner, Faizabad Mandal, Faizabad by which an Appeal No. 20/Ambedkar Nagar filed by opposite party No. 5/Sanjay Singh under Sec. 28 (3) of U. P. Scheduled Commodities Distribution Order, 2004 has been allowed.

(3.) Facts in brief of the present case are that opposite party No. 5 has granted license by way of agreement to run the fair price shop for village-Machhligaon (Jalalpur), Tehsil-Jalalpur, District-Ambedkar Nagar. On 31.5.2011 petitioner as well as other card holders made a complaint that scheduled commodities supplied to the opposite party No. 5 were not distributed to the card holders, less quantity of food grains were distributed and higher price from the fixed rate were being realized by the opposite party No. 5.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAJESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address