MUMTAZ AHMAD AND ANR. Vs. MOHD. RAFI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri Manish Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Pradip Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the caveator respondent.

(2.) The writ petition arises out of a release application, under Sec. 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 and is directed against the order dated 14.10.2016, whereby application No.8-Ga 2, under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in fling an appeal under Sec. 22 of the Act, has been dismissed.

(3.) The dispute in the writ petition pertains to House No.95/78 Bhaisiya Hata, Kanpur Nagar, wherein the petitioner is allegedly a tenant.