ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri. Bal Mukund, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. S.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the State respondents.

(2.) This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 8.8.2012 passed by Director, Urban Land Ceiling, U.P., Lucknow and the notice dated 10.9.2009 issued by the same Authority with a further prayer for mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to perform his duties as Surveyor and pay him salary regularly and give him all consequential benefits treating his service to be continuous and permanent w.e.f. 18.3.1982 onwards.

(3.) The facts relevant for the decision of the controversy can be briefly summarized as follows:-