UMMED ALI TYAGI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In our opinion this intra court appeal is a manifest abuse of the process of this Court and manifestly ill advise.

(2.) In this judgment and order in appeal the learned Single Judge has reproduce, the judgment of the writ Court in Petition No. 31387 of 2003 filed by the present petitioner himself from paragraph Nos. 7 to 21 details of the 15th petitions filed before this Court from time to time and order which were passed by the Courts, have been noticed. Para 7 to 21 read as under:-

(3.) The learned Single Judge noticed that in writ petition No. 33989 of 2000 (8th Petition) which was dismissed vide order dated 17.8.2000, a finding has been returned that the petitioner was never appointed as Secretary, he was only permitted to work on the said post by way of a temporary arrangement.