(1.) Heard Shri Abhijit Nigam, learned counsel for the appellants, Shri Adnan Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.
(2.) Facts in brief of the present case are that initially, plaintiff/Pramod Kumar had filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant for interfering the possession and house on the land which has been shown as a,b, c & d in the map filed along with the plaint registered as Regular Suit No. 290 of 1986 (Pramod Kumar Rai and another Vs. Vishambhar Dayal & others). During the pendency of the said suit, Pramod Kumar died, substituted by his legal heirs, thereafter the said suit was allowed by judgment and decree dated 27.05.1996 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), South, Unnao, challenged by the defendants by filing Civil Appeal No. 68 of 1996 (Vishambhar Dayal & others Vs. Smt. Prakashwati & others), dismissed by judgment and decree dated 14.09.2001 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 7, Unnao.
(3.) In view of the said factual background, present second appeal under Section 100 CPC has been filed.