LAWS(ALL)-2017-2-111

AMI CHAND Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Decided On February 20, 2017
AMI CHAND Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Gulrez Khan, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Standing counsel for State of U.P.

(2.) Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation, Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as UPSIDC), through its Chairman is respondent no.2 and notices were issued to it by registered post A.D. as well as Courier to him. Perused report dated 28.07.2016. Service of notice upon respondent no.2, is deemed sufficient under the Rules. Neither respondent no.2 has chosen to appear through counsel nor any one representative of respondent no.2 is appeared, hence we proceed to hear and decide appeal against respondent no.2 ex-parte.

(3.) This is an appeal under Sec. 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1894'), arisen from judgment and award dated 28.10.1976, passed by Sri P. C. Saxena, Ist Additional District & Sessions Judge, Meerut, in Land Acquisition Reference (hereinafter referred to as 'LAR') No. 394 of 1972, whereby market value determined by Special Land Acquisition Officer (hereinafter referred to as 'SLAO'), has been confirmed and Reference has been answered accordingly.