LAWS(ALL)-2017-10-9

DILIP GIRI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Decided On October 30, 2017
Dilip Giri Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and order dated 17.11.2015 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Court No. 1, Muradabad in Sessions Trial No. 98 of 2011 (State Vs. Dilip Giri) arising out of Case Crime No. 115 of 2010, under Sec. 376 IPC, Police Station Hazrat Gadi, District Muradabad, whereby the appellant Dilip Giri has been convicted and sentenced to 14 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50,000.00 with default stipulation.

(2.) In a short compass, the facts which give rise to the present appeal are that first information report was lodged by the informant on 14.7.2010 at about 15:10 hrs with the allegation that on the said date in the morning, he was doing work in the sugar cane field. The informant's sister came there with meal. After having food and finishing work, he returned to the house but his sister gone to collect woods and did not return back. Again he reached the field at 1:00 P.M. and found that his sister was crying in the sugarcane field and accused Dilip Giri was committing rape. He tried to apprehend him but could not succeed and appellant fled away. After the registration of the case, the investigation was entrusted to Investigating Officer who prepared the site plan, got victim medically examined, took possession of the salvar and chunni and sent to the forensic laboratory for obtaining reports, prepared recovery memo, copied the chik FIR and G.D. in the case diary and after concluding the investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against the appellant under Sec. 376 IPC. The charges was framed in the aforesaid Sec. to which accused appellant denied and claimed to be tried.

(3.) To bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution has examined as many as six witnesses. P.W. 1 is the informant Sugar Pal Singh. He has stated that he was doing work in the sugar cane field on 14.7.2010. His sister came there with meal and after taking food and finishing the work, he returned to the house but his sister gone to collect woods. When he returned at 1:00 P.M. at the field he found that his sister was crying and accused-appellant after committing rape fled away.