RADHEY SHYAM Vs. ANIL KUMAR BHARGAWA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Swapnil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) Present petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

(3.) By the impugned order dated 20.8.2016 the application paper no. 16-Ga filed by the petitioner to the effect that one release application filed under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act 13 of 1972 against two tenants, occupying two different shops at different rate of rent, is not maintainable and therefore, the court cannot proceed to hear the same and the release application is liable to be rejected. Only one tenant has filed this application and he has come forward to challenge the same before this Court. The application was rejected by the trial court holding that the single release application against two different tenants is maintainable. The recall application against the aforesaid order was also rejected vide order dated 13.9.2017. These two orders are under challenge before this Court.