(1.) This writ petition was filed questioning the tender dated 10.6.2016 and the order dated 22.7.2016 primarily on the ground that the tender conditions have been tailored contrary to what has been laid down by the Court between the parties in an earlier decision in Writ Petition No.11775 (MB) of 2015 decided on 10.2.2016. According to the petitioner, the respondent No.5 is not in possession of the chassis of the model as prescribed and the tender dated 10.6.2016 has been tailored in violation of Rule 125 - C of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 and the notifications issued thereunder to extend the benefit of the contract to the 5th respondent.
(2.) The petition was initially entertained and the following order was passed on 3.8.2016:-
(3.) Affidavits were filed in the matter and a contest was put forth by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation as well as by the respondent No.5.