JAGRUP PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. P. Singh, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashok Mehta for the respondent No. 3, the Official Liquidator and the learned Standing Counsel for the other respondents.

(2.) THE relief claimed in this petition is for a mandate to the respondents to absorb the petitioners in any Government Department in pursuance of the U. P. Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government or Public Corporation in Government Services Rules, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the Absorption Rule, 1991 ).

(3.) HOWEVER, the petitioners kept quiet and now after such prolonged delay have approached this Court with the explanation that they are residents of under developed place and when they came to know about one of the Judgments rendered in the case of Ramvir & Anr. v. State of U. P. , Writ Petition No. 70878 of 2006, decided on 17-1-2007 they have approached this Court. In Ramveer's case the petitioner had approached this Court earlier when the petition was disposed off with a direction to the State to take a decision in their case, but that is not so in the present case.