VIVEK KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Nigam, Additional Solicitor General of India for the respondents and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner has undergone apprenticeship training in BHEL Jhansi in the year 1992 -93. He claims that in view of the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in U.P. Road Transport Corporation v. U.P. Parivahan Nigam Shikshuka Berozgar Sangh and Ors. AIR 1995 SC 115 he is entitled far appointment on the post of Fitter on preferential basis, as he has undergone training in the establishment.

(3.) THE contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that he has made several representations and on the last representation dated 14.5.2007 the petitioner has been informed vide letter dated 19.5.2007 (Ahnexure -4 to the writ petition) by the respondents that no recruitment has been made on the post of Artisan till date after order dated 2.5.98 has been passed by the High Court. It appears that thereafter respondent No. 2 has decided to fill up the post of Fitter thereafter by Scheduled caste Candidates.