NARENDRA KUMAR Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AGRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Sri Prakash Gupta for the petitioner and Sri V. K. Goel for the respondents.

(2.) THE writ petition was dismissed in default on 25-8-2006 as under : "the case has been taken up in the revised list. No one has appeared to press this petition. This is an old case. THE petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. "

(3.) A Counsel who is engaged in a case is duty bound to appear in the case for conducting the case. However, for seeking adjournment he should have this much courtesy to inform the Court for not being able to prosecute the same due to any difficulty which he may be facing including a situation where in spite of information his client has not responded or given any instructions.