PUSHPA ASWAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the peti tioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.

(2.) IN all the above writ petitions, the petitioners who are working as Head master/ Headmistress in the Primary Schools have been transferred by the respondents on. different dates. The ground transferring the petitioners is comm9n that since the particular peti tioner had joined his/her present place of posting in the INstitution at the last therefore; he/she is being transferred being an excess teacher. Aggrieved with the transfer orders, the petitioners have approached this Court.

(3.) THE respondents have filed coun ter affidavit in writ petition bo. 940 (ss) 2007 Smt. Pushpa Aswal vs. State and others to which the petitioner Smt. Pushpa Aswal has filed rejoinder affida vit in the aforesaid writ petition. THE re spondents have submitted that the coun ter affidavit filed in the said writ petition may be read in all other writ petitions.