RAM BHAROS SAROJ Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN the instant petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of respondent No. 2, Commissioner, Food and Civil Supply, U. P, Lucknow dated 12. 11. 2007 placing the petitioner under suspension in a pending departmental proceeding.

(2.) SRI C. B. Yadav, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently contended that the charges are not so serious that in the event it is established the petitioner would be given major punishment and hence there was no occasion to place him under suspension. In support of his contention, he placed reliance on Rule 4 of U. P. Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 and a Division Bench judgement of this Court in Dr. Atvind Kumar Ram v. State of U. P. and others, 2007 (8) ADJ 659 (DB ).

(3.) WITH the above directions/observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. .