SANTOSH SINGH Vs. RAM BABU

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The dispute is about the land situate in front of Plot No.2437 of which the plaintiff-appellant claims to be the owner.

(2.) Both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court have recorded a categorical finding of fact that the plaintiff-appellant is not the owner of the said land. These findings are based on the perusal of the evidence on record.

(3.) The scope of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been explained by the Supreme Court in a number of decisions. In Panchugopal Barua Vs. Umesh Chandra Goswami reported in (1997) 4 SCC 713 the Supreme Court while explaining the scope of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure observed as follows:-