VIRENDRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision against the order dated 15 -12 -1988 whereby the learned S.D.M., Roorkee, district Saharanpur made his order dated 20 -11 -1988 absolute on the report of Constable No. 468 Kaloo Ram that the revisionist and others had refused to receive the conditional order dated 29 -11 -1988. Relying upon the said report of Constable Kaloo Ram, the learned Magistrate made his conditional order absolute; hence this revision.

(2.) I have heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Pandey, holding brief of Sri G.C. Saxena, for the revisionist and the learned A.G.As. S/S Indra Pal Singh Rajpoot and A.K. Tewari.

(3.) SECTION 134, Cr.P.C. lays down that the conditional order shall be served upon the person against whom it is made, in the manner provided for service of a summons.