AMIYA KRISHNA Vs. BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY AGRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINEET Saran, J. Heard Sri M. C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri A. K. Tripathi holding brief of Sri Anil Tiwari, learned Counsel for the respondent-University. Pleadings between the parties have been exchanged and with consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been filed for a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners to appear in the second year examination of B. D. S. Course, which examinations had already commenced from 4-10-2006.

(3.) THE submission of learned Counsel for the petitioners is that because of delay in declaration of result of Supplementary Examination, they were wrongly restrained from appearing in the regular Second Year B. D. S. Examination, which started from 4-10-2006 and could appear in papers from 6-10-2006 only after the aforesaid interim order dated 5-10-2006 has been passed by this Court. Now the basic question which remains is with regard to the permission to the petitioners to appear in the paper of Second Year Examination which was held on 4-10-2006. By the interim order dated 5-10-2006, such question was left open to be considered by this Court.