GHANSHYAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Challenge in this Revision is to the order dated 7-7-2006 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti in Criminal Case No. 140 of 2005 (Ghanshyam Singh v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.). By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the revisionist Ghanshyam Singh against (1) Ashok Kumar Shukla; (2) Balwinder Singh; (3) Preetam Pal Singh (opposite parties 2 to 4 herein) has been dismissed under Section 203 Cr. P. C.

(2.) HEARD Sri Ali Hassan, learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A. G. A. for the State and perused the record of Criminal Case No. 140 of 2005 carefully. Since, no adverse order has been passed against the opposite parties No. 2 to 4, hence, notices have not been got served on them, because they have no locus standi to contest the revision.

(3.) HAVING given my thoughtful consideration to the aforesaid submissions made by the learned Counsel for the revisionist and after going through the record of Criminal Case No. 140 of 2005 (Ghanshyam Singh v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.), I agree with the learned Counsel for the revisionist that learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has committed gross illegality in dismissing the complaint.