NARENDRA VIKRAM SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel.

(2.) BY the impugned order dated 24.2.1995 the U. P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow, has rejected the claim petition of the petitioner.

(3.) THE charge-sheet is dated 19.7.1985. THE petitioner sought further 15 days time for filing a reply on the ground that he had to attend to his ailing wife. This request of the petitioner was refused by the Enquiry Officer and the enquiry report dated 26.8.1985 was submitting holding the petitioner guilty of the misconduct on the basis of records, i.e., the receipts and the accounts of deposits.