LAWS(ALL)-2007-1-64

VIPIN KUMAR Vs. RAJ KUMAR

Decided On January 12, 2007
VIPIN KUMAR Appellant
V/S
RAJ KUMAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Sri Rajesh Tripathi for the petitioner and Sri K. Shailendra for contesting respondent No. 1.

(2.) THIS petition has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 4-3-2005 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hathras in P. A. Case No. 1 of 2002, Raj Kumar v. Vipin Kumar & Ors.

(3.) A written statement was filed by the petitioner denying the allegations made in the release application that the need of the landlord is bona fide and that Sri Ajay Kumar, the eldest son of the landlord is unemployed. In fact the landlord is already doing their business from other shops and is earning sufficient income and Sri Ajay Kumar is already employed as a Munim in M/s. Anil & Co. , situated at Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Yard Hathras.