ANIL KUMAR YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 12-8-2007 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Pratapgarh whereby the services of the petitioner were terminated on the ground that the petitioner has concealed the factum of pendency of a criminal case against him.

(3.) THE petitioner submitted an affidavit stating that no criminal case was ever instituted against him and he was not facing any criminal trial.