TILAK YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINEET Saran, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 and Sri R. K. Ojha, learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent No. 3. Pleadings between the contesting parties have been exchanged and with consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being heard and disposed of at this stage.

(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the advertisement dated 14-8-2007 issued by the respondent No. 3, Committee of Management for appointment of three posts of Assistant Clerk, one of Lab Assistant and two Class IV posts. In this writ petition, there is no dispute with regard to appointment on Class IV posts. The challenge is restricted to the appointment of Class III posts which includes the three posts of Assistant Clerk and one Lab Assistant.

(3.) IN the rejoinder affidavit, it has been reiterated that only one Class III post has been filled up by promotion which is that of Sri Ram Murti Prasad.