AMIT KUMAR TYAGI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -List has been revised.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for private-respondent Sri N. I. Jafri are present.

(3.) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that charge-sheet has already been submitted against the co-accused and cognizance was taken by the A.C.J.M., Hapur, Ghaziabad by order dated 23.12.2005. Therefore, there was no justification for transferring the case thereafter to the C.B.C.I.D.