JAIRAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAVINDRA Singh, J. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A. G. A.

(2.) THIS application has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 27-2-2007 passed by the learned Special Judge D. A. A. Mainpuri in F. R. No. 11 of 2006 in case Crime No. 967 of 2004 P. S. Kotwali District Mainpuri whereby the application dated 6-2- 2007 filed by the applicant has been rejected.

(3.) CONSIDERING the facts and circumstance of the case, submissions made by the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A. G. A. and from the perusal of the record, it appears that the learned Special Judge has expressed the opinion that the applicant and other person may file the affidavit etc. against the final report but no notice can be issued to summon him to file the protest petition. The protest petition has already been filed by the first informant. The law does not require that notice be issued to the witnesses including the victim etc. The learned Special Judge has not committed any error in rejecting the application filed by the applicant. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order is refused.