ABID HUSSAIN Vs. RAJESH CHANDRA -OPP PARTY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAJESH Tandon, J. Heard Sri Tanveer Alam, counsel for the revisionist and Sri Sarvesh Agarwal, counsel for the opposite party.

(2.) BY the present civil revision filed under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, applicant- revisionist has prayed for setting aside the order dated 20th April, 2002 by which the applica tion under Order 9 Rule 13 C. PC. has been rejected.

(3.) IT has been stated that Act No. 13 of 1972 is not applicable to the shop in dispute as the same was constructed in the year, 1988 and inspite of the no tice having been sent on 04. 08. 1997, which was served upon him on 07. 08. 1997, the defendant has not va cated the shop, hence the suit for evic tion was filed.