VIMLA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition for renewal of the mining lease.

(2.) WE have heard Shri Krishna Kumar Chaurasiya, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(3.) THE learned Council for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner had filed No. Objection Certificate dated 2.2.2002 (Annexure -1 to the writ petition ) at the time o granting the lease and her renewal application should also be granted on the basis of that certificate. Though there is no written order/objection of the respondent No. 3 on the record but this is a fact that the renewal application of the petitioner has not been decided so far. The learned Standing Counsel has contended that while granting the permission to renew the lease, a fresh 'No Objection Certificate1 is required and without that the renewal application cannot be accepted. Rule 6A runs as under: