ROSHAN LAL MITTAL Vs. RENT CONTROL AND EVICTION OFFICER/S D M TEHSIL SIKANDRABAD DISTRICT BULANDSHAHR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE two writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment, as jointly agreed by the learned counsel for the parties. To appreciate the controversy involved in both the writ petitions, facts are noted from the leading case, i.e., Writ Petition No. 19926 of 1995 which will suffice.

(2.) RAISING a short controversy, the present writ petition is on behalf of a permanent lessee in whose favour a lease has been created by means of a registered lease deed dated 17.4.1916 in respect of a vacant piece of land whereupon shops No. 848 and 848(1) are situate at Nayaganj (Girbarganj), Bulandshahr.

(3.) THE Rent Control and Eviction Officer/Deputy District Magistrate, Sikandrabad, by the order dated 26.5.1995, allowed the said application and fixed the liability on the petitioner to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 3,590.75 paise w.e.f. August, 1976. Questioning the legality and validity of the said order the present writ petition is.