HARVIR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINOD Prasad, J. The applicant Dr. Harvir Singh has filed this revision challenging the order dated 22-1-2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Aligarh in Criminal Revision No. 541 of 2006, Ravi Kant Savita v. State of Uttar Pradesh.

(2.) THE short question which is involved in this application is as to whether in a complaint case filed by the complainant Dr. Harvir Singh can a third person (Ravi Kant Savita) be allowed to get his statement recorded at the stage of inquiry under Section 202 Cr. P. C. against the wishes of the complainant and also without being summoned by the Magistrate for giving evidence.

(3.) I have heard Sri V. P. Srivastava assisted by Sri Akhilesh Srivastava, learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned A. G. A. on behalf of respondent No. 1 as well as Sri Dharmendra Singhal and Rahul Raghav on behalf of Ravi Kant Savita, respondent No. 2.