STATE OF U P Vs. ARUN KUMAR YADAVA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS refer ence has come up before this Court for taking proceedings under the Contempt of courts Act on the basis of a letter dated 5-9-2005 of Shri Abdul Qayyum, Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ Judicial Magistrate, khaga, Fatehpur. The District Judge, fatehpur forwarded the said report to this court on 12-9-2005. The letter of Shri Abdul qayyum, Civil Judge (Junior Division)/judicial Magistrate, Khaga, Fatehpur reads as follows: (Vernacular matter omitted. . . . . . . . . Ed.)

(2.) ON the basis of the aforesaid report, joint Registrar (C and L) submitted a note on 10-10-2005 before the Registrar General of this Court which reads as under:

(3.) THE perusal of the letter of Shri Abdul qayyum and the report of the In-charge / o. S. D Computers shows that the allegations against Shri Arun Kumar Yadav, Advocate are that on 5-9-2005 he had moved a surrender application of Chandrapal alias badarda, s/o Sri Mathura, under various sections of Indian Penal Code. Since against the aforesaid accused the Court has already issued process under Section 82, Cr. P. C. for the offence committed under various sections of Indian Penal Code and as the sections mentioned in the application and process under Section 82, Cr. P. C. were differed, the Presiding Officer called for a report from the police station concerned, fixing 6-9-2005 for the disposal. At about 3. 45 p. m. same day when the Presiding Officer was dictating the order to his Stenographer in Original Suit No. 200/90, Balraj v. Rangpal, the contemnor Shri Arun Kumar yadav came inside the Court room shouting and said in loud voice. (Vernacular matter omitted. . . . . . . . . Ed.)