(1.) Sri V.K. Birla, learned counsel, appears for the tenant petitioners in both the writ petitions Sri Madhav Jain, learned counsel appears for the landlord respondent No.3, Dharmshala Lala Gaya Prasad Bihari Lal in both the writ petitions through caveat. Petitioners and proforma respondents are tenants of two adjoining shops. The shop adjacent to the main gate of Dharmshala will be referred to as shop No.1 and the other shop adjacent to the said shop as shop No.2. At present, there is no dividing wall in between both the shops. Landlords filed eviction suits, against the original tenant, Sri Devi Prasad Khanna in respect of both the shops being S.C.C. Suit No.183 of 1996 and 184 of 1996. Both the suits were decreed for eviction and arrears of rent by J.S.C.C., Agra on 16.01.2003. Against the said judgments, two revisions being S.C.C. Revisions No.9 & 10 of 2003 were filed. A.D.J., Court No.9, Agra, dismissed both the revisions 27.07.2007, hence these writ petitions.
(2.) On the persuasion of the Court and after consulting their clients, several times, learned counsel for both the parties agreed for settlement of the dispute through compromise in the following terms:-
(3.) Both the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of in terms of the above compromise and both the impugned judgments, decree of the trial court and order of the revisional court are modified accordingly.