AKHIL KUMAR JAIN Vs. STATE O

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINOD Prasad, J. This matter is taken up in the revised list. Learned Counsel for the applicant Sri V. P. Gupta is not present. Sri Amit Sinha learned Counsel for the respondent who had filed his power on 21. 8. 2007 is present alongwith learned AGA.

(2.) TWO applicants Akhil Kumar Jain and Smt. Kanchan Jain have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with the prayer for quashing of the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2700 of 2006 pending in the Court of CJM, Mainpuri, appellated as Vijay Kumar lain v. Akhil Kumar Jain and others under section 498-A, 406, 504 and 506 IPC and section 3/4 of D. P. Act, P. S. Kot-wali Mainpuri, district Mainpuri.

(3.) ON 21. 1. 2003 Mukti Jain was blessed with a daughter in B. R. Nursing Home Mainpuri for which the in-laws were informed but they did not care for her. After that respondent No. 2 requested to take back Mukti Jain but her in-laws refused to bring her back. Ultimately on 6. 5. 2005 Mukti Jain filed an application for maintenance under section 125 Cr. P. C. Because of the aforesaid litigation on 23. 8. 2005 the applicants Akhil Jain and Deep Chandra Jain at 9 a. m. came to the house of the informant and abused the whole family and threatened them with their lives. Wilh such allegations a FIR was lodged by the father respondent No. 2 at the concerned police station.