INDU DWIVEDI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ARUN Tandon, J. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri D. K. Srivastava, Sri A. K. Yadav, Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Sri R. P. Tewari and Sri Prakash Padia, Advocates on behalf of Bundelkhand University, Sri Rajeev Joshi, Advocate on behalf of National Council for Teachers Education, Sri C. B. Yadav, learned Chief Standing Counsel on behalf of State respondents.

(2.) SINCE the basic facts, relevant for decision of the dispute and the legal aspects involved are identical in all these writ petitions, they are being decided by this common judgment. The facts recorded in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 39963 of 2004 are being stated for the purposes of present judgment treating the same to be the leading case.

(3.) AFTER scrutiny of the forms as well as the qualification and other norms, a list of selected candidates for admission to Special Basic Training Course-2004 was published on 15th July, 2004. Names of the petitioners were not included in the list so published. Reasons disclosed to the petitioner is that there were, not holders of a degree of B. Ed. recognised as such by the National Council for Teachers Education, therefore, not qualified. Petitioners have approached this Court by means of these writ petitions referred to above in some of these writ petitions an interim order was granted by this Court, wherein it was provided that the candidatures of the petitioners for admission to Special Basic Training Course-2004 shall not be rejected only on the ground that they have obtained degree of B. Ed. from the Bundelkhand University, Jhansi.