SADHO SINGH Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Sarvesh Agarwal, counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. None appears for respondents no. 5 to 15.

(2.) BY the present writ petition, the pe titioners have sought following reliefs :-"it is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased : 1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling upon the opposite party no. 1 to produce the record of Revision no. 581 of 73-74 and its conected records and to quash to orders of the respondent nos. to 3 dated 13-9-1974,12-1-19: and 2/- 12-1971 respectively. 2. To issue such a writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case so that justice be done.

(3.) PETITIONERS have submitted that they were in possession of the land in dispute since 1364 Fasli as such, they fill a Suit under Section 229-B of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Lal Reforms Act against the respondent the set, which was abated by the orders of the Revenue Court on 16-02-1970 after coming into force of the U. P Consolidation Holdings Act, 1971.