SURESH CHAND VAISHYA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. P. Singh, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashok Mehta for the respondent No. 3, the Official Liquidator and the learned Standing Counsel for the other respondents.

(2.) IN spite of the time being granted learned Standing Counsel has not filed any counter-affidavit. IN connected matters, the Official Liquidator has filed his counter-affidavit.

(3.) HOWEVER, the learned Counsel for the State and the Official Liquidator have urged that even according to the own showing of the petitioners they are not covered under the Absorption Rules of 1991.